![]() |
|
ENGLISH
PORTUGUESE LINGUISTICS & CULTURE |
| Autor: | Fran |
| E-mail: | não-disponível |
| Data: | 11/JUN/2012 10:16 PM |
| Assunto: | about CVC ending |
| Mensagem: |
Edit plus ed only, for the past; no double t. What about the CVC rule, why doesn't it apply to the word edit, like stop / stopped? I think the answer is because the stress is on the first syllable of the word edit, right? This link is very helpful: Thanks to all who will share their comments! |
English Made in Brazil -- English, Portuguese, & contrastive linguistics
about CVC ending Fran 11/JUN/2012, 10:16 PM