![]() |
|
ENGLISH
PORTUGUESE LINGUISTICS & CULTURE |
| Autor: | Mateus |
| E-mail: | não-disponível |
| Data: | 27/NOV/2006 8:19 AM |
| Assunto: | Uso do had had |
| Mensagem: | Não é bem assim, esta contração realmente existe e é usada. Acabei de perguntar para um advogado canadense e ele disse exatamente isto. Não é tão frequente, mas não é errada e nem anormal. |
English Made in Brazil -- English, Portuguese, & contrastive linguistics
Uso do had had Alexandre Ferreira
24/NOV/2006, 12:03 AM
Uso do had had Josi 24/NOV/2006, 9:12 AM

Uso do had had Johannes 24/NOV/2006, 9:33 AM

Uso do had had Visitor 24/NOV/2006, 9:53 AM

Uso do had had Alexandre Ferreira 24/NOV/2006, 10:35 AM


Uso do had had Dale/RS 24/NOV/2006, 10:50 AM



Uso do had had Visitor 24/NOV/2006, 2:08 PM




Uso do had had Uriel RS 24/NOV/2006, 3:49 PM





Uso do had had Josi 24/NOV/2006, 3:59 PM






Uso do had had Johannes 24/NOV/2006, 4:18 PM







Uso do had had Josi 24/NOV/2006, 5:25 PM








Uso do had had Mateus 27/NOV/2006, 8:19 AM

Uso do had had Cassio
17/MAR/2011, 9:48 PM